🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive move to restrict social platforms access for those under 16 is sending ripples internationally. Politicians, safety advocates, and families are watching with great interest to see if this approach will set a precedent for other nations.

European Movement

Throughout Europe, a increasing group of nations are moving toward comparable restrictions.

• Denmark has stated a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the prime minister stating that phones and platforms are "stealing our children's childhood". The policy may be passed in the coming year.
• Norway is preparing to enforce a minimum age limit of 15, pointing to the need to shield young people from the "influence of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is developing a digital ID system to authenticate the age and identity of social media participants. The media minister have suggested that an similar ban remains "one of the tools on the table".
• In The Spanish government, the president has asked lawmakers to approve a proposal raising the access age for joining social media to 16.
• In The French government, the president has threatened a ban for those under fifteen, and a legislative committee has recommended a comparable move, potentially involving an overnight "digital curfew" for adolescents.
• The government in The Dutch government has urged parents to restrict their children from social media until 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has adopted a advisory statement demanding a ban for under-16s unless a parent decides otherwise is granted. While it cautions of the "compulsive" nature of these platforms, the move does not create mandatory rules.

"A clear age restriction is a good first step," stated one MEP supporting the initiative.

Britain: A Watchful Approach

Across Britain, the leadership has not ruled out a potential ban, stating that "nothing is discarded" but stressing any policy must be "based on strong research".

Earlier, support built behind a legislative effort to enact limits on social media use by minors, but it was in the end watered down. However, the administration pledged to further research the issue.

Charities have raised warnings. An organization established by the relatives of a young person who died after encountering disturbing social media material contends that a blanket age ban could fail to protect children and could result in a "dangerous transition" of harm when young people reach the legal age.

"This ban is a answer to the failure of the Silicon Valley to create platforms and apps that are secure and fit for children," commented a leading child protection advocate.

The United States: A State-by-State Landscape

In the United States, action is primarily happening at the state level against a backdrop of country-wide gridlock.

• Utah mandates guardian permission for minors to use social media and restricts overnight use.
• Florida has enacted a law barring under-14s from creating accounts on social media, though it is subject to constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has enacted a regulation capping under-16s to a single hour of social media time per day, with extra time dependent on adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise introduced laws demanding guardian approval for teenagers to set up social media profiles.

Even with bipartisan support and suggestions from some figures to mimic this path, a nationwide ban is presently seen as improbable.

Global Perspectives

Beyond the West, additional countries are similarly taking action.

• Malaysia intends to restrict social media for under-16s starting from next year.
• Brazil has lifted the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

However, international bodies take a more nuanced position. A major UN agency has cautioned that age-based restrictions carry risks and "may even backfire". The body notes that social networks can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable young people and that regulation should not be a "excuse" for platform operators to prioritize child safeguards.

As this global conversation unfolds, the steps of the Australian government and several other countries indicate that states internationally are no longer content to stand by for tech companies to self-regulate.